Covid 19 - truth is for losers

If the only information you have received about Covid 19 has been via the mainstream media, you may believe that Covid 19 really is as dangerous as the media portray it to be. As a consequence, you quite likely believe that the lock-downs, social distancing, and masks are necessary. I would invite you, at this point, to seek other sources of information on the subject.

Here are a few reasons to do so.

1. The death rates due to Covid 19 have been grossly exaggerated
2. PCR tests being employed yield a huge number of false positives
3. The risks posed by asymptomatic transmission are not as high as portrayed by the media

Ultimately, the 'science' being employed to justify the continuing restrictions is abysmally bad. Based on my reading over the past months, there is effectively no doubt in my mind that wide-scale scientific fraud has been committed in probably every nation that adopted the WHO guidelines.

Scientists who reject the mainstream narrative

I refer you below to some scientists who have defended the counter-narrative far more rigorously than I have the time or expertise to do.

• Professor Dolores Cahill - the danger of vaccines, the likelihood of preexisting immunity, the exaggeration of the threat posed by the virus
• Dr. Succharit Bhakdi - a general overview of the bad science, the unsuitability of PCR tests for detecting active infections
• Dr. Mike Yeadon - skeptic of masks, lock-downs, PCR tests and mandatory vaccines
• Professor Carl Heneghan - the unreliability of Covid 19 death statistics - with a focus on UK statistics AFAIK
• Dr. John Ioannidis - better estimates of the true infection fatality rate
• Dr. John Lee - failure of disease modelling to effectively predict the spread and impact of the virus, anti-lockdowns
• Professor Sunetra Gupta - co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, advocates 'focused protection' of the vulnerable rather than a full population-wide lock-down

What can we do?

Is legal action a viable course for defending civil liberties and fighting against mandatory vaccinations? I am aware of a few people taking legal action and / or preparing legal campaigns:

• Tracy O'Mahony - Ireland - campaign: Erosion of fundamental freedoms - link: https://ie.gofundme.com/f/erosion-of-fundamental-freedoms
• Sam Dolan - UK - campaign: End the UK government lockdown - link: https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/lockdownlegalchallenge/
• Dr. Reiner Fuellmich - Germany - campaign: Crimes against Humanity - link: https://www.fuellmich.com/

I commend these people and their efforts, but I am not optimistic about the outcomes - at least in the short term. The states defending against these challenges - to my knowledge - are in line to receive huge injections of money from the IMF (Internal Monetary Fund) in the coming months (2021). With this sort of financial backing, the defendants would be able to call on an armada of legal personnel.

This pessimism notwithstanding, we can at the very least publicly state our positions and voice our opinions. Even if our governments have acquiesced to UN and WHO dogma and bullying, we can at the very least state that this is morally reprehensible and indefensible.

Truth is for losers

So a few scientists disagree with the mainstream narrative. Big deal? Who cares about the real science anyway, huh? What's happened has happened, and the IMF will be along next year with sums of money heretofore unimaginable to bail our nations out and to 'build back better', right? All we need to do is to take the vaccine, and then we get back to the way things were, or - in fact - even better than things were before.

Who cares that the science and statistics used to justify all this change was bogus and fraudulent?

Get with the times man! Science is, ya know, 'flexible'. The course is set, stick with the winners lad. Stay close to the 'medicine men' - the movers and the shakers. That's where the money's at (wink, wink).

Truth? Pffft ... Truth is for losers.